Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Access to dermatologists is limited in many low-resource regions, which creates a need for automated triage tools that are accurate yet light enough for modest hardware. This paper presents a compact convolutional neural network (CNN), trained from scratch, that places a Squeeze-and-Excitation (SE) channel-attention block in each of its four convolutional stages. From a public collection of clinical skin-disease photographs, a class-balanced dataset of 68,568 images in 24 classes (23 disease categories and healthy skin) was built by randomly undersampling every category to 2,857 images. On a held-out split of 13,728 images, the SE-CNN (5.01 M parameters) reached 88.55% top-1 accuracy and a macro F1 of 0.888, with a micro-averaged ROC AUC of 1.00. In a controlled ablation on a reduced subset, adding SE blocks to an otherwise identical network raised validation accuracy from 64.2% to 73.1% and test macro F1 from 0.49 to 0.59 while adding less than 1% to the parameter count. On the same subset, the SE-CNN also exceeded MobileNetV2 and DenseNet121 trained under the same protocol. The paper closes with an explicit account of the evaluation limits of this study, including image-level splitting and the reuse of the held-out split for early stopping, and the experiments needed before clinical use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Md. Ariful Islam (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: