Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mass and entropy bookkeeping for black holes in Einstein-Cartan spin-torsion gravity with the Aldred Limit rho_A = 9.72e54 g/cm^3. (a) A mass M accumulated at rho_A occupies R_A(M) = [3M/(4 pi rho_A)]^(1/3) (3.66e-8 cm at one solar mass); at first touch, under a stated uniform-core plus power-law-envelope profile with index alpha = 2, the bounced core has radius 7.42e-15 cm and mass 1.67e13 g independent of progenitor mass, while across alpha in [1.5, 2.5] the first-touch mass fraction spans some 32 orders of magnitude and is therefore a property of the profile, not of the frame. (b) Hawking evaporation has a floor: the horizon encloses mean density rho_A at M_rem = [3 c^6/(32 pi G^3 rho_A)]^(1/2) = 8.66e13 g = 3.98e18 Planck masses (horizon radius 1.29e-14 cm, Hawking temperature 1.42e12 K); centrally concentrated cores raise the floor as f^(-1/2), to 6.37e14 g for an n = 3 polytropic concentration. (c) At the remnant mass the frame and the standard singular picture assign the same Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, S/k_B = 1.99e38, which is 3.85 times the remnant's baryon-count entropy scale; the retained capacity is a fraction (M_rem/M)^2 = 1.90e-41 of a ten-solar-mass hole's initial entropy, so the bookkeeping relocates the evaporation endpoint without claiming to resolve the information question. All numbers are produced by the deposited compute.py. AI-use disclosure: this paper was prepared with the assistance of Dave, an AI system built by Aldred Industries; all computations were performed and checked by script, and the author of record reviewed the results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: