Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dense older urban districts face combined heat and stormwater pressures, yet the thermal and hydrological functions of blue-green infrastructure (BGI) are frequently assessed separately. This study integrates ENVI-met microclimate simulations with a planning-level runoff-retention capacity assessment to compare green roofs, permeable roads, water bodies, and integrated portfolios in Central District, Taichung, Taiwan. Its contribution is a cross-typology hydrothermal comparison under common assumptions that distinguishes among absolute benefits, area-normalized efficiencies, and spatial trade-offs while incorporating implementation constraints. Full permeable-road implementation reduced the domain-averaged, pedestrian-level air temperature by 0.61 °C and physiological equivalent temperature (PET) by 1.37 °C. Water bodies provided the highest equivalent unit-area retention depth (81 cm) but could increase localized radiant exposure when they replaced shaded vegetation. Green roofs offered distributed retention despite limited cooling at 1.5 m. A feasible portfolio combining 50% roof greening, selective permeable-road retrofits, and water-body allocation reduced air temperature by 0.29 °C and PET by 0.46 °C, with a nominal retention capacity of 47,953 m3.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: