Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Bayesian updating provides a rigorous probabilistic framework for reliability assessment of safety-critical structures by fusing prior knowledge with site-specific observations. However, in real-world engineering practice, monitoring data are often extremely sparse, resulting in several fundamental challenges (e.g., ill-posed likelihood functions, high prior sensitivity, the curse of dimensionality, and likelihood misspecification). This paper presents a state-of-the-art review of Bayesian updating strategies for overcoming these limited-data obstacles. Four advanced methodologies are systematically reviewed, including efficient sampling and approximation techniques, surrogate-model-assisted updating, multifidelity and multisource data fusion, and physics-informed Bayesian machine learning. Typical applications in bridge engineering, geotechnical engineering, and offshore platform foundations are summarized. Despite tremendous advances, critical research potentials persist, such as real-time updating for digital twins, integration of imprecise probability theories, time-varying degradation models, and consideration of hydraulic properties and structure-interaction effects. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive reference for researchers to perform robust Bayesian reliability updating in the inevitable presence of sparse data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: