Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted appendectomy use is increasing despite uncertain clinical benefit and economic value relative to laparoscopy. We evaluated comparative outcomes, operative efficiency, and modeled value. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults undergoing intended minimally invasive appendectomy for appendicitis using 2022-2024 ACS NSQIP data. Robotic utilization was assessed among 140,148 patients. Clinical outcomes were compared using 1:2 propensity-score matching. The primary endpoint combined unplanned conversion to open surgery, postoperative transfusion, organ-space surgical-site infection, and reoperation. Surgical costs were simulated using literature-derived inputs; value incorporated risk-adjusted outcomes and simulated costs. RESULTS: Robotic utilization increased from 0.7% in 2022 to 2.7% in 2024. Among 2,257 robot-assisted and 4,514 matched laparoscopic cases, the primary composite occurred in 5.5% versus 5.3% (OR 1.06; 95% CI 0.85-1.32; P=.61). Robot-assisted appendectomy required 15.48 additional operative minutes (95% CI 13.66-17.31; P<.001), without significant differences in readmission, mortality, or length of stay. Median simulated costs were $4,526 versus $2,416. Laparoscopic-to-robotic modeled value ratios ranged from 1.53 to 1.80. Even assuming no incremental robotic procedural-cost premium, laparoscopy retained higher modeled value for the primary composite (ratio 1.31; 95% CI 1.09-1.54). Exploratory analyses of complicated appendicitis and BMI ≥40 kg/m² identified no significant clinical advantage with robotics. CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted appendectomy utilization increased nearly fourfold without an observed improvement in short-term outcomes. Longer operative time, higher simulated costs, and lower modeled value persisted across sensitivity analyses, supporting continued scrutiny of robotic adoption for an operation effectively performed laparoscopically.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wiggins et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: