Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Drug-metabolizing enzymes (DMEs), which are crucial for xenobiotic biotransformation, profoundly influence therapeutic efficacy, drug safety, and physiological homeostasis. However, conventional analytical methods such as LC-MS/MS and fluorescence-based assays face limitations in background interference, spatiotemporal resolution, and in vivo imaging, while the structurally diverse catalytic cavities and overlapping substrate preferences of DMEs complicate isoform-specific activity assessment. In this context, chemiluminescence (CL) probes, particularly programmable Schaap-type 1,2-dioxetanes that operate without external light excitation, offer near-zero background and high sensitivity for monitoring DME activity. Here, cavity-guided CL probes are defined as probes whose recognition triggers, steric dimensions, electronic properties, and linker architectures are selected or optimized according to the substrate-binding and catalytic features of a target enzyme’s catalytic cavity. This review summarizes reported DME-targeted CL probes and discusses how active-pocket architecture and substrate-recognition rules can guide probe design for oxidases, hydrolases, and reductases. Representative applications in drug-metabolism analysis, drug–drug interaction assessment, disease-related activity imaging, and translational studies are highlighted. On this basis, we propose a design framework that matches active-pocket properties, substrate archetypes, and CL triggering mechanisms. A cross-case comparison now summarizes detection limits, linear ranges, emission wavelengths, signal enhancement, response characteristics, selectivity, precision, or reproducibility where reported, and biological applications; unreported parameters are explicitly identified as evidence gaps.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: