Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The baryon asymmetry of the universe is a single measured number with a precise price. From the Planck baryon density and the present photon density we derive the baryon-to-photon ratio eta_B = 6.12 x 10^-10 and the baryon yield Y_B = 8.69 x 10^-11, in agreement with the concordant cosmic microwave background and Big Bang nucleosynthesis value of about 6.1 x 10^-10. We recast the three Sakharov conditions as factors in a budget: an asymmetry produced per interaction, a fraction surviving washout, and an entropy dilution factor between production and the present day. For the standard electroweak route, the dimensionless charge-parity violating factor constructed from the Jarlskog invariant and the quark mass differences at a temperature of 100 GeV is 1.16 x 10^-19, giving a shortfall of 5.2 x 10^9, or 9.7 orders of magnitude, relative to the required asymmetry; even against an optimistic literature ceiling of 10^-18 the shortfall is 6.1 x 10^8, or 8.8 orders of magnitude. The electroweak route faces a second, independent deficit, because for the measured Higgs mass the electroweak transition is a smooth crossover rather than the strongly first-order transition required for departure from equilibrium. For thermal leptogenesis we evaluate the Davidson-Ibarra bound: the maximum charge-parity asymmetry at a lightest right-handed neutrino mass of 10^9 GeV is 9.9 x 10^-8, which can meet the required yield only with an efficiency factor of about 0.64; with a representative washout efficiency of 0.1 the required mass rises to about 6.4 x 10^9 GeV, and thermal production requires a reheating temperature at least of that order. No new mechanism is claimed. The result is a budget table in which each known mechanism is credited with what it can supply and charged with what the observation costs, so that the size of each gap is explicit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: