Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Most hearing loss is never fitted because audiology is scarce and hearing aids are priced as luxuries. This paper derives a fitting a phone plus earbud chain can honestly perform. A loudness-restoration mapping from pure-tone thresholds gives gain T(1 - L/100), from which the half-gain rule follows at a 50 dB input (0.50T), with 0.35T at 65 dB and compression ratio 100/(100 - T). For a flat 50 dB loss, average-speech targets are 12.5, 15.5, 17.5, 20.5, 19.5 and 14.5 dB at 250 to 8000 Hz, agreeing with stated representative NAL-style reference values to 2.06 dB RMS (maximum 4.5 dB). End-to-end latency from stated component delays is 15.64 ms wired, 55.64 ms for LE Audio and 125.64 ms for Bluetooth Classic, with first comb-filter notches at 32.0, 9.0 and 4.0 Hz; only the wired chain stays below the 20 ms own-voice disturbance bound and the 45 ms lip-sync detection bound. Feedback caps maximum stable gain at 9.0 dB (open dome), 24.0 dB (closed dome) and 39.0 dB (foam or custom mould): an open fitting serves none of the modelled losses, a closed dome fully serves only a flat 30 dB loss, and a foam or custom seal is required for a flat 50 dB loss and a sloping loss reaching 70 dB at 8000 Hz. Profound loss, severe flat loss at soft-speech gain, severe recruitment, and single-sided deafness are outside the honest service window. All results are simulated, not measured; nothing was built, worn, or tested on people, and all computations are reproducible from the deposited compute.py.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: