Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: The mode of heat treatment can either promote protein gel network formation or cause network destabilization in acidified fermented surimi, but the underlying process-structure-function relationship remains unclear. We hypothesized that direct high-temperature intervention (DHTI) at 90 °C would favor gel restructuring by coupling suppression of cathepsin L (CTSL) activity with protein crosslinking, whereas prolonged high-temperature exposure would eventually cause excessive aggregation and functional decline. Fermented freshwater surimi (FFS) was heated at 40 °C for 1 h (HT40), 90 °C for 30 min (HT90), or 40 °C for 1 h followed by 90 °C for 30 min (HT40 + 90), with an unheated control. An acidified myofibrillar protein (AMP) model was heated directly at 90 °C for 0-60 min to resolve time-dependent protein remodeling. RESULTS: Among heat-treated FFS groups, HT90 produced the highest gel strength, water-holding capacity (WHC), and whiteness. It reduced residual CTSL activity by 90.71%, increased disulfide bond content by 71.58%, and formed a compact, continuous network. HT40 + 90 showed lower endpoint CTSL activity than HT90 but lower WHC and a less continuous network, indicating that endpoint protease activity alone did not determine gel quality. In the AMP model, particle size increased sharply during the first 5 min, whereas solubility and total sulfhydryl content progressively decreased. Gel strength peaked at 5 min, then declined, and WHC decreased significantly after 40 min of heating. CONCLUSION: DHTI favored FFS gel restructuring, accompanied by reduced residual CTSL activity and enhanced covalent crosslinking, whereas prolonged heating drove excessive aggregation and loss of network functionality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: