Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose Ultra‐high‐performance whole‐body MRI gradients ( 200mT/m, 200 T/m/s) can reduce echo times (TE) in diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI), improving SNR. However, full hardware utilization is limited by cardiac (CNS) and peripheral (PNS) nerve stimulation thresholds. This work demonstrates Stimulation Constraint Optimized diffusion‐encoding (Stim‐CODE) for neuro diffusion. Methods Stim‐CODE uses the gradient optimization (GrOpt) toolbox to optimally design diffusion‐encoding gradient waveforms subject to a CNS or PNS “constraint envelope” based on other gradient events in the sequence. Stim‐CODE was evaluated in simulations and in vivo protocols with in‐plane resolutions of 1.5 1.5 mm and 1.0 1.0 mm across G = [45, 80, 200] mT/m and T/m/s. Healthy volunteers ( N = 10) underwent neuro DWI at b = 1000 s/mm with Monopolar, Stim‐CODE‐, Bipolar, and Stim‐CODE‐ encoding. SNR, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, and ADC uncertainty were quantified. One volunteer underwent DTI with the same encoding schemes acquired at = [1000, 3000]s/mm. Results Stim‐CODE reduced TEs across all ‐values, with larger gains for higher resolutions, greater G, and ‐nulled waveforms. Phantom and in vivo experiments confirmed equivalent diffusion‐weighting with TE savings and SNR improvements. Stim‐CODE‐ had significant SNR gains over Bipolar scans, but some differences in global ADC were observed. DTI metrics were similar across scans, with Stim‐CODE showing lower uncertainty. Conclusion Stim‐CODE maximizes hardware capabilities to achieve time‐optimized diffusion‐encoding while respecting CNS and PNS, enabling similar diffusion‐weighting as conventional approaches with reduced TE and higher SNR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hannum et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: