Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Counting stacked wood-based panels from side-view images is difficult because adjacent layers have similar appearances and weak boundaries. In this study, we introduce an annotated medium-density fiberboard (MDF) and particleboard image dataset and Stack1D, a structure-aligned density-regression architecture. The dataset comprises 409 images of single-thickness stacks and 24 images of mixed-thickness stacks. Stack1D combines two-dimensional feature extraction with width-wise feature aggregation and one-dimensional density decoding along the stacking axis. We compare Stack1D with six YOLO detectors and CSRNet-based density models across three progressive training-count settings, using higher-count validation data for model selection. Evaluation covers maximum-count images of single-thickness stacks and a separate mixed-thickness test set. The best-performing density architecture varies with material, training stage, and test condition. In the maximum-count tests, Stack1D variants achieve the lowest density-model errors in several settings, while channel-reduced two-dimensional models remain competitive, particularly when both materials are used for training. On the evaluated mixed-thickness stacks, the best-performing YOLO detectors achieve lower counting errors than the density models. These findings characterize the relative strengths of detection and density regression for panel counting under shared acquisition conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Küçükmanіşa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: