Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Vector metric spaces in the sense of Çevik and Altun take values in a vector lattice, but their axioms use only the order of the value space. We develop the theory for vector metrics with values in an Archimedean pre-Riesz space E, i.e.\ an ordered vector space admitting a bipositive order dense embedding i into a vector lattice Y. We ask when an E-valued vector metric d and the vector-lattice-valued metric i∘ d have the same convergent and Cauchy nets and sequences. Relatively uniform convergence transfers along every cover. For nets, o₃-convergence transfers if and only if the cover has an intrinsic domination property. This property holds for pervasive covers, by a result of Kalauch and van Gaans, for uniformly dense covers and in finite dimensions; it fails for an example of Kalauch and van Gaans. Sequential convergence transfers under a countable domination property implied by uniform density, but not under pervasiveness. For uncountable $Γ$, the vector lattice R 1⊕ c₀₀(Γ) is pervasive in its Dedekind completion ^∞(Γ) without the transfer, while for countable $Γ$ the transfer holds; the difference is explained by order separability. In finite dimensions, with a closed generating cone, all these convergences coincide with norm convergence in every cover. For C¹[0,1]-valued integral metrics, positivity of the kernel on the diagonal forces all order convergences to coincide with L¹-convergence. For the Volterra kernel (t-s)₊, by contrast, L¹-convergence, relatively uniform convergence and order convergence are pairwise different, and we describe each explicitly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cüneyt Çevik (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: