Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fluorine-free hydrocarbon proton-exchange membranes offer an alternative to perfluorosulfonic acid (PFSA) electrolytes, but good membrane-level properties do not always translate into membrane-electrode assembly (MEA) performance. Here, dense poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (PPO) films were sulfonated in the solid state, yielding a sulfur distribution that appeared homogeneous through the membrane thickness and ion-exchange capacities (IEC) of 1.17–2.20 meq g−1, corresponding to sulfonation degrees of 16–32 mol% and water uptake from 55 to 92%. The sulfonated PPO (sPPO) membrane with the highest IEC that remained self-standing was tested in a single-cell MEA and compared with a Nafion® 212-based MEA prepared and operated in the same way. The sPPO-based MEA showed lower hydrogen crossover and higher apparent short-circuit resistance than the Nafion® 212 reference. However, its high-frequency resistance (HFR) was also higher, corresponding to an apparent MEA-level conductivity of 11 mS cm−1 at 80 °C and 70% RH, compared with 40 mS cm−1 for Nafion® 212. This gap persists even though sPPO has a higher hydration number. Since the catalyst layers contain a PFSA ionomer, this HFR-based conductivity includes membrane, electrode, and interfacial contributions. The sPPO membrane reached a peak power density of 0.45 W cm−2 at 80 °C and 90% RH. In a short-term potentiostatic test, the sPPO-based MEA failed after approximately 6 h. Together with swelling, tensile, and Fenton data, these results identify dimensional control, oxidative stabilization, and better membrane–ionomer compatibility as the next steps and provide a quantitative MEA-level baseline for solid-state sulfonated PPO membranes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luca et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: