Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives To validate a blood-based liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MS) method “HiRes Mass-Fix” as a fit-for-purpose, patient-specific method for detecting low level M-proteins in patients who have reached negativity by MALDI-TOF MS “Mass-Fix”. Methods Analytical validation included precision, accuracy, analytical measurement interval, limit of detection, specificity, ion suppression, carryover, and extracted-sample stability. Clinical performance was assessed by comparing 174 patients with bone marrow (BM) measurable residual disease (MRD) by next-generation flow cytometry (NGF) to both Mass-Fix and HiRes Mass-Fix. Results HiRes Mass-Fix demonstrated acceptable precision, accuracy, linearity, specificity, and stability for its intended use, with an average limit of detection of 3.8 mg/L. HiRes Mass-Fix detected M-proteins in 41 of 58 Mass-Fix negative samples. This raised blood MRD positivity from 62 to 89 % against a BM NGF positivity rate of 51 %. Blood-BM agreement fell from 71 % (kappa 0.43) by Mass-Fix to 58 % (kappa 0.15) by HiRes Mass-Fix, driven by blood-positive/BM-negative discordance. IgG was overrepresented among discordant cases (68 vs. 45 %, p=0.003). Conclusions HiRes Mass-Fix was successfully validated and demonstrated to increase M-protein detection in samples negative by Mass-Fix. IgG recycling may explain the blood-positive/BM-negative discordance, and serial measurements will be needed to distinguish residual M-protein from ongoing production. Blood-based M-protein measurement is a less invasive, lower-cost alternative to bone marrow biopsy for ongoing patient monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pearce et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: