Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We present a three-stage framework for monitoring chronic temperature–humidity sensor drift in grain storage. A target-masked coupled heat–moisture proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) surrogate produces an expectation independent of the target sensor; spatial-consistency and temperature–humidity-coupling evidence decouples genuine grain-condition changes from isolated sensor deviations; and a normalized three-objective physics-informed autoencoder trained with multi-gradient descent estimates signed drift, standardized severity, onset time, and a maintenance grade. The framework was evaluated on approximately 36 million records from 12 horizontal paddy-rice warehouses across three depots, including 127 labeled chronic-drift events and 20 reference-instrumented locations. Under Protocol A, which is the leave-one-depot-out protocol, the five-seed result reaches precision of 91.5%, recall of 92.9%, window PR-AUC of 0.908, mean/P95 detection delay of 7.2/12.3 days, and a grain-anomaly misattribution rate of 3.1%; the per-depot breakdown of this same protocol retains macro recall of 92.8±1.4%. On the 87 independently confirmed events, precision is 92.0% and the final sensor-drift identification rate is 90.8% (79/87; 97.5% of the 81 detected events). The independent physical reference, validated against the co-located reference instruments, reaches a bias-corrected RMSE of 1.15 ∘C and 0.56%RH; a representative 30-day window reduces RMSE from 0.689 to 0.294 ∘C and from 0.392 to 0.235%RH. The field-sensor aggregate (1.26 ∘C, 0.37%RH) is optimistic for humidity because the reference is calibrated to those same field sensors. Drift magnitude has an MAE of 0.22 ∘C/0.27%RH, onset a median error of 2.1 days, and the maintenance grade an agreement of 88.1% (37/42) against the reference-derived grade. Online latency is 16.2 ms on the normal monitoring path and 42.7 ms on the complete three-stage alarm path. The method separates source attribution from drift estimation, exposes weak drift before it exceeds sensor accuracy, and delivers maintenance-ready outputs at low online cost.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: