Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SIGNIFICANCE AND BACKGROUND: Blood culture contamination contributes to diagnostic errors, unnecessary antibiotic use, prolonged hospital stays, and increased healthcare costs. In 2024, a system-wide initiative was launched across a 15-hospital Midwest healthcare system to reduce contamination rates using the Practice and Process Improvement: Integrated Evidence-Based Quality (PPQ) Model, which integrates evidence-based practice (EBP) and process improvement methodologies. AIMS OF THE INITIATIVE: This initiative aimed to: (1) identify best practices for the reduction of blood culture contamination; (2) reduce blood culture contamination by implementing the best practice, which included standardized, evidence-based collection kits and dedicated teams to enhance team competency; and (3) establish a sustainable feedback system to support practice and continuous quality improvement. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE: Guided by the Advancing Research through Close Collaboration (ARCC) model and the DMAIC process, a multidisciplinary team identified best practices and practice and process gaps. Interventions included redesigning blood culture kits to integrate forcing functions and aseptic techniques, embedding multimodal education strategies, and launching a small test of change with robust leadership support. Real-time data feedback loops and unit-based contextual assessments supported sustainable implementation. OUTCOMES: Post-implementation, the test unit achieved zero contaminations and zero CLABSI events over 5 months. Compliance with peripheral collection by dedicated, trained staff exceeded 98%. Projected cost avoidance included $133,500 in antibiotic use and $2.4 M from reduced length of stay. The initiative demonstrated operational feasibility, system alignment, and improved care quality. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: This project demonstrates how practice and process improvement combined with well-planned implementation leads to positive outcomes and substantial return on investment. Effective collaboration between interprofessional teams led to successful system-wide implementation, resulting in practical and sustained practice change.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martini et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: