Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sepsis remains a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide, and early diagnosis continues to be challenging because of nonspecific clinical manifestations. Neutrophil CD64 (nCD64) upregulation and monocyte HLA-DR (mHLA-DR) downregulation are important immunological responses during sepsis. A flow cytometry-based Sepsis Index (SI), integrating nCD64 and mHLA-DR expression, may improve diagnostic accuracy compared with individual biomarkers. Hence, the study was done to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the Sepsis Index compared with individual biomarkers (nCD64 and mHLA-DR) in suspected neonatal sepsis. This prospective observational diagnostic accuracy study enrolled 81 neonates (41 suspected sepsis, 40 controls) at IMS & SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India. Flow cytometry was used to measure nCD64 and mHLA-DR expression. ROC analysis determined optimal cut-offs. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios were calculated using SPSS v22. The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of nCD64 demonstrated a sensitivity of 43.90% and specificity of 74.36%, while mHLA-DR showed a sensitivity and specificity of 46.34% and 72.97%, respectively. The Sepsis Index exhibited superior diagnostic performance compared with either biomarker alone, achieving a sensitivity of 60.00%, specificity of 97.30%, PPV of 96.00%, NPV of 69.23%, and an AUC of 0.80. These findings indicate that the composite index provides improved discrimination between septic and non-septic neonates. The Sepsis Index is a sensitive and highly specific biomarker for diagnosing neonatal sepsis. Combining measures of neutrophil activation and monocyte immunosuppression provides a comprehensive assessment of immune dysregulation and yields higher diagnostic accuracy than either nCD64 or mHLA-DR alone. The Sepsis Index may serve as a valuable adjunctive tool for the early identification of neonatal sepsis and could help improve clinical decision-making in neonatal intensive care settings. Not applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhola et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: