Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Most footwear factories still check shoes by eye. This is slow, and different inspectors often reach different decisions. This paper presents DefectGuard, a camera-based system that finds and classifies visible defects in shoes and gives each shoe a PASS, FAIL or REVIEW result. The system uses a YOLOv8m object detector trained on 6,240 images of 14 shoe models, covering eight defect types such as scratches, stitching faults and excess glue. On the test set, DefectGuard reached a precision of 0.908, a recall of 0.878 and an mAP@0.5 of 0.910, which is better than the three baseline models compared. It processes one image in 18.6 ms on an NVIDIA RTX 4090 GPU. Using a higher input resolution raised recall on small defects from 0.71 to 0.79. In a six-week pilot on a production line, the system inspected 38,400 shoes and its analytics helped the factory find and fix a recurring glue problem. These results show that AI-based inspection is practical for everyday footwear quality control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yogesh. Mirpuri (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: