Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A local postal code introduced for one settlement must do three jobs: name every household, leave room to grow, and betray its own copying errors. This paper sizes the code for a settlement of 8500 households with a stated growth factor of 1.8 over the planning horizon and a quarter of the code space held in reserve: 20400 codes are required, so 5 digits — capacity 100000, a headroom of 4.9 times — plus one check character, for a total length of 6. The check character, a weighted mod-11 sum, was verified by exhaustive testing rather than asserted: all 180000 single-digit errors in the test set were caught, and all 14410 adjacent transpositions were caught. A sizing table for settlements from 500 to 120000 households shows digits growing by one per tenfold of population, which is why a code sized for a town must never be borrowed from a village. SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: