Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mpox has shifted from a disease mainly associated with zoonotic spillover in Central and West Africa to a recurrent global public-health threat involving sexual-contact networks, household transmission, international mobility, ecological persistence and clade-specific uncertainty. Mathematical models have clarified important mechanisms in the 2022 clade IIb outbreak, including the role of heavy-tailed sexual-contact distributions, behavioural adaptation, vaccination and case isolation. However, the literature remains less mature in one respect that is essential for preparedness: the conversion of transmission insight into reliable, setting-specific forecasts. This narrative review synthesizes peer-reviewed modelling evidence on mpox transmission patterns and evaluates the extent to which existing compartmental, stochastic, network, agent-based, phylodynamic and time-series models support future outbreak prediction. The review identifies four recurring gaps: insufficient prospective validation, weak integration of spatial and cross-regional lags, limited clade-specific parameterization for clade I/Ib risk, and inadequate incorporation of immunity, reporting delay and surveillance uncertainty. We propose a forecasting-oriented framework that links epidemiological state variables, contact structure, population immunity, mobility, interventions and uncertainty quantification to decision-relevant outputs. The novelty of this review lies in repositioning mpox modelling from retrospective explanation toward predictive readiness. A forecasting-first approach can strengthen early warning, targeted vaccination, communication planning and health-system preparedness, particularly in settings where surveillance is delayed, incomplete or geographically fragmented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Allehyani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: