Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Posting boxes are emptied on timetables written for the average box, though boxes fill at wildly different rates. This paper compares a fixed collection schedule with a fill trigger — empty the box when it holds a stated number of items, reported by sensor or by the deliverer's count. At a stated arrival rate of 26 items a day, trip cost USD 7.50 and delay priced at USD 0.03 per item-day, the best fixed schedule collects every 4.39 days at USD 3.421 a day, while the best overflow-safe trigger, 98 items, costs USD 3.445 a day — marginally more than the schedule, the premium for holding the threshold far enough below capacity — with a mean wait of 1.87 days. The trigger's real advantage is not this margin but its self-adjustment: it collects oftener as the box's use grows and seldomer as it fades, without a timetable review. Its risk is priced too: with a half-day response lag, the probability of the 120-item box overflowing after the trigger fires is 0.7622 percent. SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: