Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Buildings without gutters shed their roof water from the eave edge, and the standard remedy for the erosion and splashing that follow is a gravel-filled trench along the wall. Trenches are almost always dug to a conventional width — 300 mm is common — without any calculation of where the water actually lands. This paper computes the landing point from the fall trajectory. In still air, water leaving a 3.5 m eave at a stated edge velocity of 0.30 m/s lands 0.253 m from the wall face, and once a splash allowance of 0.15 m is added the trench must be 0.45 m wide to contain it; the conventional 300 mm trench therefore misses the drip line even with no wind at all, at every eave height examined from 2.5 m upward. A light wind of 2 m/s pushes the required width at a 3.5 m eave to 0.70 m, and a 600 mm trench — twice the conventional width — tolerates only about 1.55 m/s of wind at that height before the impact point passes its outer edge. The paper gives a width table over eave heights of 2.5 to 7.0 m and winds of 0 to 4 m/s, the gravel volume each width implies, and the impact energy the gravel must absorb, which rises from 34.4 J per litre at 3.5 m to 68.7 J per litre at 7.0 m. All results are simulated, not measured.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: