Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Autonomous optical navigation requires a spacecraft to determine where it is and how it is oriented using onboard measurements. Small optical-tracker mounting errors couple the attitude and orbit estimates and can bias both if not estimated. This work treats spacecraft attitude, orbit, and the three-axis alignment of two optical trackers as a single estimation problem using stellar and celestial-body direction measurements. The formulation preserves the multiplicative geometry of attitude and unit-vector measurements and extends the nonlinear uncertainty treatment from unscented sampling to sparse Gauss–Hermite quadrature (SGHQ) at Levels 2 and 3. A multiplicative extended Kalman filter (MEKF), a fully multiplicative unscented Kalman filter (FM-UKF), and fully multiplicative sparse Gauss–Hermite quadrature filters (FM-SGHQFs) at Levels 2 and 3 are evaluated under identical dynamics, measurements, calibration states, and noise realizations. Monte Carlo results show little separation at the fine estimator-cycle interval, but clear differences at the coarse estimator-cycle interval. The FM-UKF and Level 3 FM-SGHQF retain close agreement between predicted covariance and empirical Monte Carlo dispersion, whereas the implemented MEKF loses consistency and the Level 2 FM-SGHQF becomes overconfident. Among the methods considered, the FM-UKF provides the best balance between statistical consistency and computational cost across the investigated regimes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ganganath et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: