Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pediatric wheeze recognition can support the automated analysis of respiratory sounds and reduce dependence on subjective auscultation. This study develops and evaluates a lightweight machine-learning approach for event-level wheeze/no-wheeze recognition using the publicly available SPRSound pediatric respiratory sound database. Respiratory events were extracted exclusively from the expert-annotated temporal boundaries provided with the dataset, without automatic event segmentation. A total of 9,089 annotated respiratory events were represented using Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs), delta, and delta-delta features summarized into a fixed 120-dimensional vector. Logistic Regression, Linear Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine with a radial basis function kernel (SVM-RBF) were evaluated under the same acoustic-feature pipeline. The operating threshold of the SVM-RBF classifier was optimized using the INTRA-2022 partition and subsequently applied to the inter-patient INTER-2022 partition. At this operating point, the model achieved a sensitivity of 0.935 (95% CI 0.901–0.957), specificity of 0.777 (95% CI 0.752–0.801), ROC-AUC of 0.930, PR-AUC of 0.772, and F1-score of 0.679; the positive predictive value was 0.534, reflecting a substantial false-positive burden. As a secondary software-level contribution, the trained preprocessing and classification components were integrated into an Android–Flask client–server workflow for audio submission, server-side feature extraction, inference, and result visualization. The software workflow was functionally implemented but was not quantitatively validated using respiratory recordings acquired through a smartphone microphone. Accordingly, the reported performance characterizes event-level classification under SPRSound conditions and should not be interpreted as mobile-acquisition, diagnostic, or clinical validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Villa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: