Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study investigated whether the combined application of the lung ultrasound score (LUS score) and serum miR-224-5p enhances the prognostic prediction accuracy in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Patients with ARDS were stratified into the survivor and non-survivor groups according to their 28-day survival status post-diagnosis. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify prognostic risk factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was applied to evaluate the predictive efficacy of two-variable combined model (LUS score + serum miR-224-5p). In vitro, BEAS-2B cells were treated with LPS. Cell viability was evaluated by the CCK-8 assay. Caspase-3 activity assay, MDA content measurement, and SOD activity assay were conducted to evaluate cell apoptosis and oxidative stress. The transcriptional and secretory levels of inflammatory cytokines (IL-6/IL-8/IL-1β) were determined by RT-qPCR and ELISA, respectively. An elevated LUS score was identified as a risk factor for unfavorable prognosis, while miR-224-5p served as an independent protective factor. Integrating the LUS score with miR-224-5p markedly improved prognostic predictive accuracy, yielding a combined model with an AUC of 0.8924 (95%CI: 0.8370–0.9479), 83.33% sensitivity and 84.78% specificity. In cells induced by LPS, miR-224-5p significantly enhanced cell viability, increased the activity of SOD, and reduced the synthesis of MDA and inflammatory factors. As the target of miR-224-5p, SETD7 (SET domain-containing lysine methyltransferase 7) weakened the protective effect of miR-224-5p. The combination of LUS score and miR-224-5p can effectively improve the accuracy of prognostic assessment in patients with ARDS. miR-224-5p mitigates LPS-induced bronchial epithelial cell injury via targeted regulation of SETD7. However, given that this was a single-center retrospective study, the prognostic model requires validation in multicenter cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: