Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Phonological awareness (PA) is one of the strongest predictors of reading and writing acquisition. Small female advantages have been reported in related verbal domains — chiefly in tasks whose response modality involves oral production — but evidence directly assessing sex differences in PA itself is scarce. This study examined whether sex differences would emerge in a seven-game digital battery (JILEC-1), answered exclusively through touchscreen selection with no oral production, administered to 632 Brazilian children (328 girls; 304 boys) from Kindergarten to Grade 2 — speakers of Brazilian Portuguese, an orthography of intermediate depth. Using Welch’s t tests with Holm correction, no significant differences were observed on any of the seven games or on the composite score (Game Progress Index, GPI; d = 0.035–0.124; minimum detectable d = 0.22; upper bound of the 95% CI for the overall index: d = 0.23). The pattern did not vary across grades (Sex × Grade interaction: p = .313) or schools ( p = .949), and held for an index restricted to the five PA-proper games. Exploratory component analyses revealed opposing, mutually cancelling profiles: girls were slightly more accurate (d = 0.103) and boys slightly faster (d = − 0.035). In hierarchical regression, sex contributed a partial R² of 0.6%, whereas school grade explained 49% of the variance, with the largest gain at the transition into Grade 1 (d = 1.47). Combined with the full scalar measurement invariance across sex documented for the battery, the results provide initial evidence of sex-equitable measurement in this format and position assessment format as a hypothesis to be tested in direct format comparisons.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eugênio et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: