Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a severe complication of diabetes mellitus characterized by chronic non-healing wounds and a high risk of amputation, and early molecular diagnosis remains an unmet clinical need. Methods: RNA-sequencing data from GSE134431 (13 DFU vs. eight diabetic foot-skin samples) were analyzed with a limma-equivalent empirical-Bayes moderated t-test, identifying 721 differentially expressed genes. Because the LASSO/SVM-RFE intersection was configuration-sensitive and did not recover the prioritized genes, tyrosinase (TYR) was treated as a pre-specified candidate selected by differential-expression significance, melanin-pathway enrichment, and biological plausibility; its ranks among the 721 DEGs by adjusted p-value, |log2FC|, and training AUC are reported. Performance was evaluated by nested leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV), apparent AUC with bootstrap 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and external cohorts (GSE80178 and GSE68183; quantile-normalized and z-scored per dataset). Single-cell data (GSE165816) were re-analyzed to quantify TYR before and after quality control, and CIBERSORT was used for immune deconvolution with Benjamini–Hochberg correction and group-adjusted correlations. Results: In nested LOOCV, TYR was re-selected in all 21 folds with a held-out AUC of 0.971. TYR was significantly downregulated in the external cohorts (merged six DFU vs. 12 non-DFU: p = 0.0047, direction-aware AUC = 0.903, bootstrap CI 0.736–1.000), including the within-GSE80178 comparison of DFU versus diabetic foot skin (p = 0.0238). In single-cell analysis, TYR was genuinely expressed after quality control (64.2% of melanocytes), and melanocyte proportions were reduced in DFU at the sample level (p = 0.040). After correction for multiple testing, resting and activated mast cells, CD4+ memory-activated T cells, and follicular helper T cells differed between DFU and controls, and TYR showed a group-adjusted positive correlation with M1 macrophages (R = 0.460, p = 0.036). Conclusions: TYR is a reproducible candidate diagnostic biomarker for DFU supported by nested validation, external cohorts, and single-cell evidence. HOXC10, which was not replicated externally, is retained as an exploratory observation only. Larger prospective cohorts with diabetic non-ulcer controls and functional experiments are required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: