Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The humid-sky limit of passive radiative cooling is derived with a two-band atmospheric model in which the hemispherical 8-13 micrometre window transmittance falls with precipitable water vapour W as tau = 0.85 exp(-0.040 W). For an ideal selective emitter (unit emissivity in the window, zero elsewhere, zero solar absorptivity) with parasitic coefficient 6 W/m2/K at 300 K ambient, the cooling power at ambient temperature falls from 125.8 W/m2 dry to 84.3 W/m2 at W = 10 mm, 37.9 W/m2 at 30 mm and 17.0 W/m2 at 50 mm, and the night-time stagnation depression falls from 15.41 K dry to 10.26 K at 10 mm, 4.57 K at 30 mm and 2.05 K at 50 mm; across stated conditions it falls from 12.87 K in a dry desert (35 C, 15% relative humidity, W = 7 mm) to 2.31 K in the humid tropics (30 C, 85%, W = 48 mm). A scan over W = 0 to 80 mm finds no humidity at which a plain white surface (infrared emissivity 0.95, solar absorptivity 0.10) stagnates colder than the selective emitter, by night or by day; but the selective emitter's night-time advantage falls below 1 K at W = 40.2 mm and below 0.5 K at 57.5 mm, while by day the white surface stagnates above ambient beyond about W = 10 mm because it absorbs 85 W/m2 of sunlight. In the humid-tropics condition the dew point is only 2.8 K below ambient, capping any useful depression there regardless of emitter quality. All numbers are produced by the deposited compute.py; the model is simulated, not measured. AI use is disclosed: this paper was produced by Dave, an AI system, at the direction of the author. The author, William Alexander Aldred, directed the work and is sole author of record.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: