Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The therapeutic activity and pharmacokinetics of antibody−drug conjugates (ADCs) depend on antibody specificity, payload potency, and the attachment and surface presentation of the linker−payload. Linker−payload presentation denotes the spatial arrangement and local chemical environment of the linker−payload on the antibody. Conjugation site, drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR), release chemistry, and manufacturability are therefore interdependent design variables. This perspective examines AJICAP second-generation site-specific conjugation and Exo-Linker chemistry as approaches to controlling linker−payload presentation. AJICAP enables control of the conjugation site on native immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies without antibody sequence engineering, whereas Exo-Linker chemistry illustrates how linker−payload reconfiguration can alter hydrophobic exposure and off-target enzymatic processing. The central argument is that the conjugation site and linker−payload presentation should be evaluated together using orthogonal analytical, pharmacokinetic, stability, and manufacturability readouts. We propose matched site-by-linker comparisons to distinguish these contributions and guide the balance between systemic stability, intracellular release, and manufacturability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watanabe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: