Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Submerged swirl-generating piers guide inflow toward an annular weir and promote rotating flow in the upper shaft, but also restrict the inlet passages. This study examines the resulting tradeoff using a 1:50 Froude-scaled physical model and three-dimensional Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations with an RNG k–ε closure and a volume-of-fluid (VOF) formulation. Pier number N, connection angle θ, and length L are varied over 4~12, 5–25°, and 12~20 m, respectively, in prototype dimensions. Three inlet regimes are observed within the tested range: free-pier flow at H/P < 0.9, transitional flow at 0.9 ≤ H/P ≤ 1.1, and submerged-pier flow at H/P > 1.1. A local discharge-coefficient minimum is observed near H/P ≈ 1.05, coinciding with the onset of overtopping; interaction between the upper and lower flow paths is a proposed explanation. Increasing pier number or length, or decreasing connection angle, generally increases predicted tangential velocity while reducing discharge capacity at a given head. At Q = 400 m3/s, increasing L from 12 to 20 m reduces the maximum inlet velocity magnitude from approximately 4.17 to 2.77 m/s while increasing predicted tangential velocity. These fixed-discharge comparisons include the accompanying change in head. The results describe the tested configurations; shaft velocities and air-core dynamics have not been independently validated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: