Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
International business scholarship has long documented that the benefits of globalization accrue unevenly: large multinational enterprises (MNEs) capture most cross-border value, while small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which constitute the overwhelming majority of firms worldwide, remain largely excluded from global value chains. This exclusion is primarily a matter of constraint rather than ambition or product quality. The prevailing internationalization models-stage theories, the Uppsala model, and born-global paradigms-assume access to market intelligence, foreign-market capital, multilingual talent, and regulatory-compliance capacity that resource-constrained SMEs often cannot supply. The Value-Yield Optimization (VYO) Framework (Yevsiukova, 2026) addressed this problem domestically by ranking AI-driven optimization opportunities according to the return achievable within a firm's real capital, labor, and technical limits. This paper introduces the Global Value-Yield Optimization (G-VYO) Framework, which extends VYO to the cross-border domain. G-VYO differs from VYO in three respects: it adds three cross-border factors (market distance, currency and macroeconomic volatility, and regulatory friction) to the constraint-weighting function; it adds a sixth stage, a systemic resilience audit of the international portfolio; and it introduces a three-axis readiness-headroom-distance decision cube for entry-market planning. The framework specifies five foundational principles, a six-stage operating sequence, and a Global Constraint-Weighted Return on Investment (GCW-ROI) function with explicit measurement rules and a worked numerical example. Four country-entry archetypes are illustrated with five published empirical studies of SME internationalization from Eastern Europe, Southeast Asia, Latin America, and Sub-Saharan Africa. The paper contributes a practitioner-oriented, platform-agnostic methodology for more inclusive participation of resource-constrained SMEs in the global economy and identifies four directions for empirical calibration and longitudinal validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valeriia Yevsiukova (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: