Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Finite local calibration does not by itself determine how a preparation and a detector are related through a joint physical transport. We study the ancilla-orientation family A_theta(rho) = (1-theta)rho + theta rho^Gamma for an arbitrary two-qubit state rho and binary effect E, followed by an unknown joint completely positive trace-preserving channel. Eight jointly transmitted product inputs, comprising the complete X tensor X and Z tensor Z bases, give a complementary-basis bound on the channel's Choi infidelity. A channel-distance estimate and the retained local calibration bound then yield the uniform selector enclosure b_E + sqrt(2 s_rho) + (1+theta)epsilon, including the generally nonpositive candidate. One physical compatibility set gives simultaneous inner and outer confidence intervals for the restricted safe class. A sufficient fixed allocation of 21,600,000 trials has coverage at least 0.99; an explicit integer rule has transpose-exclusion power at least 0.996 at a stated alternative and an accepted upper endpoint at most -0.000620. The construction consumes 43,200,000 prepared qubit instances. Conversely, an exact joint channel can fix every isolated-leg input with the other leg held in |0>, remain at maximal half diamond distance from identity, and change the safe interval while preserving the complete permitted record law. A one-basis phase-channel obstruction provides a second control. The result combines established process-verification methods with a finite-count safety certificate and precisely specified weaker-record obstructions. Compatible complex types, bounded controls, a common transport context, and declared drift remain explicit premises. The source-and-evidence companion preserves the paper-specific Lean sources and historical execution, exact numerical programs and receipts, the separate AI-assisted review return, and the release source/build/validation records. Formal support remains conditional on eleven analytic-law inputs and three acquisition contracts. No end-to-end formal verification, experimental validation, or external human peer review is claimed. Release rights are scoped by component: CC BY 4.0 for the article and author-owned documentation/data; a newly prepared MIT grant for original author-owned software and Lean sources; and the original licenses and notices for third-party or inherited material. The companion rights notice specifies the scope and exclusions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qingchun Zhang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: