Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The role of emotion-robust biometric identification is increasingly important because identity cues should remain reliable under changes in the affective state of a user. This article introduces a multi-modal framework that re-interprets the AFFEC dataset, which was initially created to analyse emotions, as a benchmark for biometric identification of 73 subjects across five synchronized modalities, namely, EEG, face, eye tracking, galvanic skin response and cursor behaviour. To prevent leakage and evaluate cross-session generalization, a stringent run-wise protocol is adopted that converts raw recordings into identification-oriented descriptors and raw EEG tensors based on modality-specific preprocessing. Classical baselines such as support vector machine, random forest, multilayer perceptron and k-nearest neighbors are compared to three deep-learning architectures: an EEGNet-based dual-stream model, Resnet based dual-stream model which uses a hybrid with a residual network, and a CNN-Transformer hybrid. Experimental results demonstrate that EEG and face are most discriminative modalities, and their combination makes the best performance, with EEGNet achieving 98.38% test accuracy of EEG+Face and 97.84% test accuracy of full multimodal fusion. The research shows that multimodal fusion is better at enhancing robustness whereas emotion-robust learning may also help close the divide between affective variability and biometric stability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grandhisila et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: