Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIMS: To explore caregiving challenges experienced by family caregivers of patients undergoing oesophageal cancer surgery across different stages of the treatment and recovery trajectory and how these challenges evolve over time. DESIGN: A longitudinal qualitative study guided by the timing it right framework. METHODS: Guided by the Timing It Right Framework, this descriptive qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with 17 primary family caregivers of patients undergoing oesophageal cancer surgery. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Caregiving challenges varied across stages and evolved dynamically. Five stage-specific patterns were identified: admission and treatment-planning, emotional shock, disclosure challenges, and treatment decision-making difficulties; preoperative, concerns about surgical tolerance, psychological burden, and surgical safety; postoperative, difficulties meeting care needs, limited caregiving knowledge and skills, and physical and psychosocial strain; hospital-to-home transition, difficulties obtaining care knowledge, nutritional management challenges, and difficulties responding to negative emotions and social withdrawal; and longer-term adjustment, increasing time commitment, financial pressure, fear of recurrence, and anticipatory grief. CONCLUSION: Caregiving challenges change throughout the disease trajectory. Nurses should provide continuous, stage-specific support that addresses caregivers' evolving informational, practical, psychological, and social needs. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Stage-specific assessment, education, and support may help nurses address caregivers' changing needs during cancer treatment and recovery. IMPACT: This study highlights the stage-specific and dynamic nature of caregiving challenges across the oesophageal cancer treatment and recovery trajectory. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public involvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: