Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Household rainwater tanks are commonly sized by rules of thumb that never state the reliability they deliver. This paper replaces the rules with storage-reliability design curves from a daily water-balance simulation driven by a first-order Markov rainfall generator with gamma-distributed wet-day amounts (seed 20261110, 249 evaluation years per configuration), for two synthetic-but-representative climates (realised 520.7 mm/yr semi-arid and 1511.5 mm/yr monsoon, each with a 4-month wet season), roof areas 40/80 m2, demands 20/50 L/day, and storage 0.5-20 m3. The interpolated size for 90% reliability spans 0.85 m3 (monsoon, 80 m2, 20 L/day) to 17.30 m3 (semi-arid, 40 m2, 50 L/day). One configuration is supply-limited (semi-arid, 40 m2, 50 L/day: supply-to-demand ratio 0.91), so even 20 m3 delivers only 91.0% reliability and 98% is unreachable at any size. Audited on the same weather, the one-month-of-demand rule delivers 50.1-84.8% reliability and the largest dry-spell deficit rule delivers 87.7-100.0% at up to four times the necessary size. All results are simulated, not measured; the rainfall is a stated synthetic model, not gauge data. Computations are reproducible from the deposited compute.py and results.json.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: