Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To examine the association between surgical start timing and longitudinal patient-reported urinary health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). This single-center retrospective cohort included eligible patients who underwent RARP during the study period from 2013 through July 2026. Patients were eligible if they had a baseline Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) urinary summary score and at least one postoperative score through 12 months. Surgical start was classified as morning (AM; incision before 12:00) or afternoon (PM; incision at or after 12:00). Exact incision time was also analyzed continuously when available. The primary outcome was the 12-month urinary summary score, analyzed using a covariate-adjusted linear mixed-effects model. The cohort included 725 patients (AM, n = 385; PM, n = 340) and 2,586 postoperative observations. The adjusted PM-minus-AM difference at 12 months was − 1.38 points (95% confidence interval [CI], − 3.90 to 1.14; p = 0.283), with no clear evidence of a different recovery trajectory (interaction p = 0.157). None of the four urinary subdomain contrasts showed a clear 12-month difference after false-discovery-rate adjustment (all adjusted p = 0.430). Among 232 patients with exact incision time, each 1-hour later start was associated with a − 0.26-point difference at 12 months (95% CI, − 1.15 to 0.62; p = 0.559). In this retrospective cohort, surgical start timing was not clearly associated with patient-reported urinary HRQOL or its recovery through 12 months after RARP. These findings may provide useful information when counseling patients who are concerned about afternoon surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watanabe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: