Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ceramic–carbonate dual‐phase (CCDP) hollow fiber membranes show high potential for high‐temperature CO 2 separation due to high packing density and thin walls. However, a permeability–stability trade‐off exists: pore optimization boosts CO 2 flux but accelerates carbonate loss. Here, a synergistic strategy combining ceramic support optimization and molten salt modification is proposed. Porous GDC (Ce 0.8 Gd 0.2 O 2‐δ ) supports were used, and the effect of 5 wt% nano‐TiO 2 in carbonate was studied. GDC1450 support achieved optimal porosity and strength. The membrane attained a CO 2 permeation flux of 5.32 mL·min −1 ·cm −2 at 900°C, outperforming most reported CCDP membranes. However, during a 100 h test at 700°C, its flux dropped 76% due to carbonate loss. In contrast, the nano‐TiO 2 ‐modified membrane showed flux reduction <10%. Nano‐TiO 2 enhanced carbonate retention, suppressed leakage, and improved durability. Overall, this synergistic strategy offers a viable route to overcome the trade‐off and develop CCDP membranes with both high flux and long‐term stability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: