Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The antecedent-rainfall effects on soil–rock mixture (SRM) slope stability remain poorly quantified. This PLAXIS 3D study tracks displacement, pore water pressure (PWP), and factor of safety (FOS) through a six-stage antecedent rainfall sequence (−72 to +72 h; peak 0.134 m/day) across 12 configurations: three USDA matrices (Loamy sand, Sandy loam, and Silty loam) at volumetric block proportions (VBP) of 0%, 15%, 25%, and 35%. The model was benchmarked against centrifuge, physical-model, and field-monitoring studies of unsaturated and block-in-matrix slopes, and its sensitivity to rainfall intensity and duration, water-table depth and matrix strength was assessed. FOS was maximized within a narrow band, at 15% VBP in every matrix. Displacement and stability dissociated: Sandy loam at 35% VBP gave among the smallest peak-rainfall displacements (0.002 m) yet a lower FOS than at 15%, so displacement alone can understate risk. Loamy sand failed (FOS < 1.0) at 0% and 35% VBP. Localized positive-PWP cells around blocks, termed water patch zones, formed preferential failure paths. After peak rainfall, FOS fell for 72 h in Sandy and Silty loam, while Loamy sand displacement and PWP kept rising. From one geometry and one event, the VBP thresholds are model-based indicators for monitoring and field verification, not design values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sthavarmath et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: