Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reliable theoretical description of anionic gold clusters remains challenging because the energetic ordering of low-lying isomers is highly sensitive to the exchange-correlation functional, basis set, and relativistic treatment. In this study, we systematically benchmarked functional-basis set combinations for Au n − ( n = 1–20) by comparing optimized low-lying structures and simulated photoelectron spectra (PES) with available experimental data. An initial screening of 14 functionals (B3LYP, B3PW91, CAM-B3LYP, O3LYP, X3LYP, HSE06, M06, M06-L, M06-2X, PBE0, PBE, TPSSh, TPSS, and revTPSS) with six basis sets (LANL2DZ, SDD, dhf–TZVPP, dhf–QZVPP, def2–QZVPP, and aug–cc–pVTZ–PP) identified Au 5 − , Au 10 − , and Au 12 − as key test cases. Both revTPSS/SDD and revTPSS/LANL2DZ reproduced the literature-supported ground-state assignments for the three benchmark clusters, with comparable agreement between calculated and experimental vertical detachment energies (VDEs). This scheme was then applied to Au n − ( n = 1–20) to determine ground-state structures and electronic properties. The simulated PES and calculated VDEs reproduce the main experimental size-dependent features, including the overall spectral evolution, the even–odd alternation of VDEs, the two-dimensional (2D)-to-three-dimensional (3D) crossover at Au 12 − , and the exceptional stability of Au 20 − . These results support revTPSS/SDD as a practical computational approach for the structural assignments and detachment properties of the bare gold-cluster anions examined here.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
An et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: