Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Paths that are too steep waste the working day: the carrier slows, rests multiply, and loads that should arrive do not. This paper derives the steepest gradient that loaded traffic can climb for a full working day, from stated energetics. A porter of 70 kg carrying 25 kg, modelled with the Pandolf load-carriage equation at 0.9 m/s and a sustainable metabolic power of 400 W, is limited to a gradient of 5.1%. Slowing to 0.7 m/s raises the bound to 8.6%, and a heavier load of 35 kg lowers it to 3.4%. A handcart of 180 kg total mass pushed by one person on firm dirt is limited to 4.6%, and a 600 kg cart drawn by a 450 kg ox is limited to 3.4%, in the ox case by sustained tractive force (436 N at the bound) rather than by power. Short efforts are different: at a one-hour power of 550 W the porter bound rises to 10.2%, which is the gradient above which switchbacks or steps become unavoidable for a route intended for repeated all-day use. Descent does not bind harder on routes built to the climbing bound: the modelled knee-load factor at 5.1% is only 1.46 against an all-day limit of 3.0 reached at 22.2%, and one person can hold the handcart on descents up to 13.8%. Descent becomes the controlling problem only on short, steep pitches that climbing traffic would never use all day.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: