Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examined changes in the reading level, reading speed, and reading errors of third-grade primary school students reading at the frustration level following a 9-week instructional process that combined educational comics with the choral reading method. A single-group pretest–posttest quasi-experimental design was used with 11 students selected through criterion sampling. Data were collected with the Reading Miscue Inventory, and the same 121-word text was read at pretest and posttest. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests showed that students’ word recognition percentages (z = −2.94, p = .003, r = .63) and reading speeds (z = −2.94, p = .003, r = .63) were significantly higher, and their total reading errors were significantly lower (z = −2.93, p = .003, r = .63), at posttest than at pretest. Five students moved from the frustration level to the borderline level (90%–94% word recognition), whereas none reached the instructional criterion of 95%. The findings should therefore be regarded as preliminary evidence that educational comics combined with choral reading may serve as a supportive material for struggling early readers, which warrants further testing in controlled studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kahvecibaşı et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: