Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article investigated the sequential integration of the m-fizika.uz virtual platform with physical laboratory activities in molecular physics and the Fizpraktikum course. This exploratory, non-randomised comparative intervention study involved 80 first-year students aged 17–20 years from two intact classes at one higher education institution: 41 in the experimental class and 39 in the control class. Both groups received instruction on identical topics, physical laboratory tasks, and assessment criteria; only the experimental group completed a 15–20 min virtual pre-laboratory during the scheduled class before the physical experiment. The inferential analysis compared post-intervention categorical distributions between groups; baseline results were used to describe and compare the groups’ initial conditions but were not interpreted as evidence of equivalence. In the final results, for the motivational-cognitive criterion, χ 2 (2) = 12.783, p = 0.0017, Cramér’s V = 0.400; for the cognitive-practical criterion, χ 2 (2) = 9.999, p = 0.0067, V = 0.354; and for the activity-creative criterion, χ 2 (2) = 11.840, p = 0.0027, V = 0.385. The overall descriptive indicator based on conditional scores was 14.5% higher in the experimental group than in the control group. These post-intervention associations are exploratory; because the study compared only two non-randomised intact classes, with one class per condition, they should not be interpreted causally.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toshmurodov Nuriddin (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: