Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To investigate variations in indoor NO₂ concentrations under a subtropical climate, their relationships with indoor and outdoor environment parameters, and ways to improve prediction accuracy, this study monitored indoor and outdoor air quality in a teaching building from May 18 to May 31, 2025. Measurements included NO₂, PM2.5, PM10, O₃, temperature, and relative humidity. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated, and variables with |r| ≥ 0.3 were selected as model inputs. Multiple linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models were developed and evaluated using R² and RMSE. Based on validation results, the preferred ANN used two hidden layers, with 150 and 75 neurons, and ReLU activation. On the test set, MLR achieved an R² of 0.5975 and an RMSE of 4.8597, whereas ANN achieved an R² of 0.8528 and an RMSE of 2.9389. Compared with MLR, ANN increased R² by approximately 25.53 percentage points and reduced RMSE by approximately 39.52%. ANN also reduced the underestimation observed at high concentrations and improved accuracy across concentration ranges. These findings show that indoor NO₂ depends on multiple indoor and outdoor factors and that ANN captures their complex relationships more effectively than MLR. The results support ANN-based indoor NO₂ prediction under subtropical conditions and may inform air-quality monitoring and forecasting in similar buildings. However, the study was limited by its short monitoring period, incomplete coverage of relevant factors, and limited neural-network optimization. Future studies should address these limitations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuchen Yang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: