Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Repeated reception, aggregation, and forwarding place an energy burden on cluster heads in Internet of Things-enabled wireless sensor networks. We address fixed-cardinality cluster-head selection with an Adaptive Discrete Clustering Based Whale Optimization Algorithm (AD-CWOA). The method retains standard Whale Optimization Algorithm search dynamics and adds random-key decoding, progress-adaptive mutation, cluster-head swap refinement, and stagnation-triggered population restoration for discrete subset search. A four-component minimization objective evaluates residual-energy risk, intra-cluster distance, cluster-head-to-base-station distance, and cluster-load imbalance. The major-revision evaluation comprises 300 simulation executions: 140 fitness-weight sensitivity runs, 60 cluster-head-count runs, and 100 five-method comparison runs, with 20 paired 200-node topologies per condition. At K = 15, AD-CWOA gives FND, HND, and LND values of 1823.80 ± 63.64, 2191.00 ± 13.48, and 2511.80 ± 51.35 rounds, respectively, and cumulative source-data-equivalent throughput of 436820.25 ± 1889.11 packets. Relative to Original CWOA, FND increases by 3.92%, but LND decreases by 1.77%. The first node failure is delayed, although the network reaches complete depletion sooner. None of the twelve Holm-adjusted comparisons with Particle Swarm Optimization is statistically significant. The sensitivity experiments show that the same configuration does not maximize lifetime, stability, and communication efficiency. AD-CWOA offers an energy-aware CH-selection option for the tested network, with gains that depend on the chosen metric and operating configuration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhardwaj et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: