Key result
Alinity NT-proBNP shows 100% agreement with Architect BNP and matches RAMP below 6000 pg/mL.
Why the study?
Does the Abbott Alere/Alinity NT-proBNP assay provide comparable qualitative and quantitative clinical performance to the Architect BNP and RAMP NT-proBNP assays in patient samples?
Does the Abbott Alere/Alinity NT-proBNP assay provide comparable qualitative and quantitative clinical performance to the Architect BNP and RAMP NT-proBNP assays in patient samples?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Alinity NT-proBNP assay demonstrates complete qualitative agreement with Architect BNP and strong quantitative agreement with RAMP NT-proBNP below 6000 pg/mL, though proportional bias exists above this threshold.
Introduction N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) are biomarkers for the diagnosis and monitoring of heart failure. Both biomarkers originate from the same precursor molecule, proBNP, which is synthesized from preproBNP when ventricular or atrial diastolic wall is stretched. BNP is the biologically active peptide, while NT-proBNP is the inactive peptide that is released together with BNP in myocardial stretch. NT-proBNP has a half-life of about 70 minutes, while BNP has about 20 minutes, which makes NT-proBNP a preferred biomarker. This study evaluated the performance of the Abbott Alere NT-proBNP assay by comparing it quantitatively and qualitatively with our current RAMP NT-proBNP and Architect BNP assays. Methods A qualitative comparison was performed between Abbott NT-proBNP and Abbott BNP using 40 patient samples with BNP orders. A separate quantitative comparison was performed between two NT-proBNP platforms: RAMP and Alinity, using 173 patient samples from three community hospitals. The agreement between RAMP and Alinity NT-proBNP assays was assessed using Passing-Bablok regression analysis. Results A 2x2 table showed 100% clinical agreement between the Alinity NT-proBNP and the Architect BNP using age and gender-specific reference intervals for each biomarker. In the quantitative assessment, a Passing–Bablok regression plot showed strong agreement between the Alinity and RAMP NT-proBNP for samples under 6000 pg/mL (slope = 1.080; intercept = -6.190). The data showed excellent agreement between the Alinity and RAMP NT-proBNP assays at concentrations under 6000 pg/mL. Conclusions The Alinity NT-proBNP assay showed complete qualitative agreement with the Architect BNP assay using age and sex-specific reference intervals. Quantitatively, Alinity and RAMP NT-proBNP results were comparable, but a proportional bias was observed in the Alinity assay at concentrations higher than 6000 pg/mL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ansah-Zame et al. (2026) studied Heart failure diagnosis and monitoring (patient samples for BNP/NT-proBNP assay comparison) (n=213). Abbott Alere / Alinity NT-proBNP assay vs. RAMP NT-proBNP and Architect BNP assays was evaluated on Qualitative clinical agreement and quantitative agreement (Passing-Bablok regression) (Slope 1.080, intercept -6.190). Alinity NT-proBNP showed 100% qualitative agreement with Architect BNP and strong quantitative agreement with RAMP NT-proBNP below 6000 pg/mL.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: