Key result
Cardiac rehabilitation reaches only ~52% referral post-revascularization, with inequities spanning the care pathway.
Why the study?
Disparities in cardiac rehabilitation referral, enrollment, attendance, and program completion continue to affect equitable access to services. This preliminary evidence review examined published research on demographic, socioeconomic, geographic, and clinical determinants of inequities across the cardiac rehabilitation care pathway in Ontario, Canada.
This preliminary evidence review highlights that inequities in cardiac rehabilitation access and utilization in Ontario are stage-specific, influenced by sex, socioeconomic status, geography, and depression.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Suboptimal referral rates persist after revascularization; extends evidence of disparities while leaving optimal implementation strategies open.
Background: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an essential component of cardiovascular secondary prevention. However, disparities in referral, enrollment, attendance, and program completion continue to affect equitable access to rehabilitation services. Objective: This preliminary evidence review examines published research concerning inequities across the cardiac rehabilitation care pathway in Ontario, Canada, with particular attention to demographic, socioeconomic, geographic, and clinical determinants. Methods: Published Ontario research was identified through preliminary searches of PubMed, Europe PMC, and OpenAlex. A working inventory of 276 unique candidate records was assembled. Findings presented here are drawn from a selected interim subset of studies. Comprehensive eligibility screening and independent verification have not yet been completed. Findings: Ontario research indicates that inequities occur at multiple stages of cardiac rehabilitation. In one cohort of 3,739 patients eligible following cardiac revascularization, 51.8% received a rehabilitation referral. Other Ontario studies identified lower referral and enrollment among women, socioeconomic barriers affecting participation, and reduced session attendance associated with geographic barriers. Depression was also associated with increased noncompletion and nonadherence among rehabilitation participants. Conclusion: Available evidence suggests that inequalities in cardiac rehabilitation access and utilization are stage-specific. Improving equitable cardiovascular care requires attention to referral practices, socioeconomic circumstances, geographic accessibility, psychosocial factors, and continuity of participation. This manuscript is an independently authored preliminary evidence review (Version 1.0, November 2026). It has not undergone peer review and does not represent a completed systematic or scoping review.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nirena Nobbee (2026) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease requiring cardiac rehabilitation. Demographic, socioeconomic, geographic, and clinical determinants of cardiac rehabilitation access was evaluated on Cardiac rehabilitation referral, enrollment, attendance, and program completion. Demographic, socioeconomic, geographic, and clinical factors drove stage-specific inequities in Ontario cardiac rehabilitation, with 51.8% referral among 3,739 revascularization patients.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: