Key result
Hearing one's own name elicits more positive heartbeat-evoked potential amplitudes than other names.
Why the study?
Heartbeat-evoked potentials have been linked to self-processing, but whether their modulations reflect self-specificity rather than familiarity and depend on probabilistic context remained unclear.
Does passive listening to one's own name under different probabilistic contexts modulate heartbeat-evoked potential amplitudes compared to familiar and unfamiliar names?
Does passive listening to one's own name under different probabilistic contexts modulate heartbeat-evoked potential amplitudes compared to familiar and unfamiliar names?
Self-specific cortical processing of cardiac signals (heartbeat-evoked potentials) is modulated by the probabilistic context of external self-related auditory stimuli.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Context-sensitive self-specificity in heartbeat-evoked potentials; leaves open biomarker utility for self-processing disorders pending clinical validation.
Interoception, the cortical processing of visceral signals, has been proposed as a foundation of self-processing. Heartbeat-evoked potentials (HEPs) provide a measure of interoceptive processing and have been linked to self-processing, but whether HEP modulations reflect self-specificity rather than familiarity and depend on probabilistic context remains unclear. We recorded EEG and ECG during passive listening to subject's own names (SON), familiar names (FN), and unfamiliar name (UN) under equal- and biased-probability conditions. In the equal-probability condition, HEP amplitudes were more positive for SON than for FN and UN over centro-parietal-occipital sites at 164-242 and 258-296 ms after the R peak, whereas FN and UN did not differ. This self-specific pattern was not detected under biased probabilities. Within-name comparisons revealed probability-related HEP effects for SON and UN with distinct spatiotemporal characteristics, indicating that stimulus probability did not produce a uniform effect across name types. The late positive potential showed a comparable probability-dependent self-specific pattern, and SON-evoked LPP amplitudes positively covaried with HEP amplitudes during SON perception across conditions. These findings indicate that self-specific HEP modulations depend on probabilistic context and is associated with relatively late external self-related processing, highlighting a context-sensitive relationship between interoceptive and external self-related processing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ying et al. (2026) studied Interoceptive and self-related processing. Passive listening to subject's own names (SON) under equal- and biased-probability conditions vs. Passive listening to familiar names (FN) and unfamiliar names (UN) was evaluated on Heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP) amplitudes over centro-parietal-occipital sites after the R peak. Passive listening to subject's own names elicited more positive heartbeat-evoked potential amplitudes than familiar or unfamiliar names at 164-242 ms and 258-296 ms post-R peak under equal probability.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: