Key result
Conduction system pacing expands to ~65% of Croatian centers, predominantly using LBBAP.
Cross-Sectional (n=17)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports feasibility of conduction system pacing integration; leaves open standardization, training needs, and outcome assessment.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeljković et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiac pacing indications / electrostimulation (n=17). Conduction system pacing (His-bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing) vs. Traditional right ventricular pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy was evaluated on Center-level adoption and integration of conduction system pacing into clinical practice. Conduction system pacing has been initiated or integrated into clinical practice by 65% (11 of 17) of active cardiac pacemaker implantation centers in Croatia, with LBBAP as the predominant technique.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: