Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives: This study examines how big data analytics capability (BDAC), organizational culture (OC), and decision-making capability (DMC) shape organizational ambidexterity (OA) in telecommunications firms, both directly and through business intelligence (BI) as a mediator, and how ambidexterity drives company efficiency and performance (CEP) and, in turn, environmental performance (EP). Methods/Analysis: A structured online survey of 199 telecom professionals measured seven reflective constructs (36 items), and the integrated model was tested using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) with 5,000 bootstrap resamples. Findings: Six of nine hypotheses were supported. Decision-making capability was the strongest driver of ambidexterity; business intelligence fully mediated big data analytics capability and partially mediated decision-making capability; organizational culture showed no significant effect. Ambidexterity predicted company efficiency (β = 0.76), which improved environmental performance (β = 0.60), explaining about 60% of ambidexterity’s variance. Novelty/Improvement: The study contributes an integrated model linking data capabilities, business intelligence, and ambidexterity to environmental performance in telecom, among the first to extend the ambidexterity-performance link to an environmental outcome through the natural resource-based view, with the Baldrige Excellence Framework as an organizing lens. It advances fragmented accounts by showing that business intelligence and decision-making, not raw data or culture, drive sustainable performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laimouna et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: