Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Interleukin (IL)-23 inhibition is now an established therapeutic strategy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), supported by the efficacy of selective IL-23p19 monoclonal antibodies in both Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Advances in peptide engineering have also enabled direct oral targeting of the IL-23 receptor (IL-23R), introducing an alternative approach to inhibition of the same inflammatory pathway. This narrative review examines the biological rationale for targeting the IL-23-IL-23R axis and the clinical evidence establishing selective IL-23p19 inhibition in IBD. Particular attention is given to the clinical development of icotrokinra, an oral macrocyclic peptide IL-23R antagonist. Phase 3 studies in psoriasis have established the efficacy of oral IL-23R antagonism, while the phase 2b ANTHEM-UC study has provided clinical evidence of efficacy in IBD, with improvements in clinical and endoscopic outcomes accompanied by translational evidence of pathway suppression. Ongoing phase 3 programmes in UC and CD will determine whether oral IL-23R antagonism can achieve durable clinical and endoscopic efficacy and establish its place alongside existing IL-23p19 monoclonal antibodies. If successful, this approach could represent a broader shift towards highly selective oral targeting of extracellular inflammatory pathways that have traditionally required biological therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Honap et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: